SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship?
16 references·4 citing·45 second hop
Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship? (2022)Perceived publication pressure and resear…Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)Prevalence of Research Miscon…Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Meta-assessment of bias in sc…Annual Review of Psychology (2017)Annual Review of Psychology1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Moral disengagement (2015)Moral disengagementMisconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Responsible Conduct of Research (2014)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists (2014)Publication Pressure and Scie…Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications (2014)Bibliometric Indicators for E…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Intended and unintended conse…Publish or perish in China (2010)Publish or perish in ChinaHow Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Publish or perish, but at what cost? (2008)Publish or perish, but at wha…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyPublication pressure in medical imaging (2024)Publication pressure in medic…Deficient epistemic virtues and prevalence of epistemic vices as precursors to transgressions in research misconduct (2024)Deficient epistemic virtues a…Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing in the Field of Earth & Space Sciences (2024)Challenges Facing Scientific …Beyond the traditional: Extending academic libraries’ roles in research integrity based on the causes of research misconduct (2024)Beyond the traditional: Exten…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B (1975)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals (1997)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Scientific Utopia (2012)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods (2019)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking (2011)Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions (2022)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)A social cognitive theory of personality (1999)Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. (2008)WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2012)Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. (2018)A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth (2019)Moral Disengagement at Work: A Review and Research Agenda (2019)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? (2018)EFFECTS OF ETHNIC GROUP CULTURAL DIFFERENCES ON COOPERATIVE AND COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR ON A GROUP TASK. (1991)THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON PERCEPTIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE. (1996)THE ROLES OF SUPERVISORY SUPPORT BEHAVIORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY IN EMPLOYEE "ECOINITIATIVES" AT LEADING-EDGE EUROPEAN COMPANIES. (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,536 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,096 cited
  • 2015Moral disengagement412 cited
  • 2012Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey384 cited
  • 2017Meta-assessment of bias in science364 cited
  • 2017Annual Review of Psychology331 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2014Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists221 cited
  • 2021Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis205 cited
  • 2010Publish or perish in China184 cited
  • 2008Publish or perish, but at what cost?155 cited
  • 2014Responsible Conduct of Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

134 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications128 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Deficient epistemic virtues and prevalence of epistemic vices as precursors to transgressions in research misconduct11 cited
    • 2024Beyond the traditional: Extending academic libraries’ roles in research integrity based on the causes of research misconduct10 cited
    • 2024Publication pressure in medical imaging7 cited
    • 2024Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing in the Field of Earth & Space Sciences6 cited