Applicant faking warnings: Are they really effective?Justin R. Feeney, Richard D. Goffin, Shadi Beshai2022-09-13articlePersonality and Individual Differences9 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyEmployer Branding and e-HRMAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.References2004Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity2012Identifying careless responses in survey data.1999Accounting for the effects of accountability.2015An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions Between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples2014A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.2003Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives.2011New Perspectives on Faking in Personality Assessment1998Effects of Intentional Distortion in Personality Measurement and evaluation of Suggested PalliativesCited by2025Faking on personality assessments in high-stakes settings: A critical review2025Personality Test Validity Differs Between Low‐Stakes and High‐Stakes Employment Settings