SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
16 references·3 citing·39 second hop
Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials (2022)Transparency and reporting characteristic…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Open science saves lives: les…Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research (2021)Methodological quality of COV…Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical …Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a n…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)Evolution of poor reporting a…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Comparison of registered and …Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles of COVID-19 trials (2024)Comparison of effect estimate…No evidence of important difference in summary treatment effects between COVID-19 preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study (2023)No evidence of important diff…Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study (2023)Dissemination of Registered C…Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict (2014)A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image (2015)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,165 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts387 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19268 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
  • 2021Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic251 cited
  • 2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

237 cited
  • 2021Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research189 cited
  • 2017Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study170 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study9 cited
    • 2024Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles of COVID-19 trials9 cited
    • 2023No evidence of important difference in summary treatment effects between COVID-19 preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study8 cited