Trust in Government and COVID-19 Response Policy: A Comparative Approach

Cristina M. Stanica · Andrew W. Crosby · Sarah Larson

13 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Communication and COVID-19 Impact COVID-19 epidemiological studies COVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Abstract

As nations work to respond to COVID-19, trust in government is critical to achieving health outcomes. Studies argue that greater trust in government is associated with increased compliance with COVID-19 public health policies. This analysis investigated predictors of public trust during COVID-19 in 16 countries grouped in four regions. The data used (n = 47,000) are taken from the Worldwide COVID-19 Attitudes and Beliefs dataset. Five hypotheses test the effects of stringency, geographic location, age, gender, income, and education levels on public trust. Findings reveal that increased stringency measures and education levels are positively associated with trust.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Governing the Commons 1966A Systems Analysis of Political Life 1986Trust and Antitrust 2000Political Trust and Trustworthiness 1998The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork 1958Trust and suspicion 1999Critical Citizens 2011Contextualizing Performances of Family Firms

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.