SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Anomalies in the Peer-review System
11 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Anomalies in the Peer-review System (2016)Anomalies in the Peer-review SystemPapers Receive More Citations After Rejection [Publication Activities] (2014)Papers Receive More Citations…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Improving peer review (2006)Improving peer reviewPeer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem (2002)Peer review of statistics in …Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Peer Review (1994)Peer ReviewPeer Review (1994)Peer ReviewThe effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review (1990)The Effects of Blinding on th…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Peer review in biomedical pub…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics (2010)Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool (2015)Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI (2016)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Human Problem Solving. (1973)Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Peer Review and the Support of Science (1977)Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. (1979)Which researcher will get the grant? (1979)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Choosing Physiology Journals. (1944)Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact? (1986)journal impact factors (1998)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Bias in peer review (2012)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Journal Peer Review (1985)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Scientific peer review (2011)A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters (2008)Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals905 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 1994Peer Review280 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial271 cited
  • 1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review267 cited
  • 1974Peer review in biomedical publication241 cited
  • 2002Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem156 cited
  • 1994Peer Review155 cited
  • 2006Improving peer review14 cited
  • 2014Papers Receive More Citations After Rejection [Publication Activities]8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work