SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Estimating interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis: a comparison of methods in practice
15 references·1 citing·45 second hopsampled
Estimating interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis: a comparison of methods in practice (2022)Estimating interactions in individual par…One‐stage individual participant data meta‐analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods (2020)One‐stage individual particip…Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning (2020)Individual participant data m…Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study (2019)Statistical approaches to ide…A comparison of the statistical performance of different meta-analysis models for the synthesis of subgroup effects from randomized clinical trials (2019)A comparison of the statistic…A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio (2018)A comparison of seven random‐…A comparison of one‐stage vs two‐stage individual patient data meta‐analysis methods: A simulation study (2018)A comparison of one‐stage vs …Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach? (2017)Meta-analytical methods to id…One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information (2016)One-stage individual particip…Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ (2016)Meta-analysis using individua…Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)Get real in individual partic…Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice (2012)Statistical Analysis of Indiv…Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data (2006)Covariate heterogeneity in me…Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Meta-analysis of individual p…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2000)A multilevel model framework …Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 2: methodological guidance is available (2023)Nonlinear effects and effect …Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2012)For better or worse: An individual patient data meta-analysis of deterioration among participants receiving Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy. (2016)A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes (2018)On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis (2021)Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals (1950)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R (2013)Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage? (2013)Types of parental involvement in CBT with anxious youth: A preliminary meta-analysis. (2014)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics (2011)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Meta‐analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients (2001)The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. (2010)Mind matters: A meta-analysis on parental mentalization and sensitivity as predictors of infant–parent attachment. (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Do core interpersonal and affective traits of PCL-R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence? (2010)On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis (2010)A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners (2011)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)An extended mixed‐effects framework for meta‐analysis (2019)Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing mindfulness-based programs for mental health promotion (2023)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions? (2018)Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies (2019)Fixed- and Random-Effects Models (2021)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Using individual participant data to improve network meta-analysis projects (2022)Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
  • 2016Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ537 cited
  • 2015Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology348 cited
  • 2000A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes265 cited
  • 2012Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice232 cited
  • 2017Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?219 cited
  • 2018A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio203 cited
  • 2006Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data194 cited
  • 2020Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning177 cited
  • 2016One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information113 cited
  • 2018A comparison of one‐stage vs two‐stage individual patient data meta‐analysis methods: A simulation study97 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study
50 cited
  • 2020One‐stage individual participant data meta‐analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods39 cited
  • 2019A comparison of the statistical performance of different meta-analysis models for the synthesis of subgroup effects from randomized clinical trials17 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 2: methodological guidance is available7 cited