A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: The Effects of Common Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility

Mark R. DesJardine · Jody Grewal · Kala Viswanathan

88 citations0/0 files storedOrganization Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Corporate Finance and Governance Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

Abstract

Common owners face an incredible investment challenge: managing systematic risk. Because common owners hold shares in multiple firms across an industry, an action (or inaction) by one firm that affects industry peers is felt more severely by common owners than by non-common owners. Research has largely focused on common owners’ role in orchestrating competitive dynamics among their portfolio firms, with almost no empirical investigation of how common owners manage systematic risk. Drawing on research showing that one firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) can produce positive spillovers for peer firms and that its irresponsibility can harm its peers, we argue that common owners increase firms’ CSR to produce spillovers that reduce systematic risk and multiply their investment returns. Consistent with our theory, we find that common ownership is positively associated with firm CSR. Unpacking that relationship, we find that increases in CSR are driven by common owners with long-term orientations and are concentrated in stakeholder sensitive industries, in which CSR spillovers are most economically impactful. We also find that common owners focus their efforts on financially material CSR over financially immaterial CSR. We use a natural experiment with a quasi-exogenous shock to rule out alternative explanations. Our study contributes to literatures on the antecedents of CSR and outcomes of common ownership, providing a new perspective on how common owners shape corporate strategic behavior. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1620 .

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

References

2017Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis 2001Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?2008The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis 2019The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors 2016Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality 2017Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey 2013Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility 2008Environmental risk management and the cost of capital

Cited by

2023Shareholder Politics: The Influence of Investors’ Political Affiliations on Corporate Social Responsibility 2023The Corporate Opportunity Structure for Shareholder Activism: How Activist Hedge Funds Exploit Board Demographic Diversity 2024When the Principal Is the Firm’s Problem: Principal Costs and Their Corporate Governance Implications 2023Intra-industry or spatial spillovers: Empirical study on the impact of digital finance on green energy innovation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.