SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Situación del acceso abierto y los pagos por APC en Colombia. Un modelo de análisis aplicable a Latinoamérica
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Situación del acceso abierto y los pagos por APC en Colombia. Un modelo de análisis aplicable a Latinoamérica (2022)Situación del acceso abierto y los pagos …The Changing Landscape of Open Access Publishing: Can Open Access Publishing Make the Scholarly World More Equitable and Productive? (2021)The Changing Landscape of Ope…Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation (2021)Article processing charge exp…Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note (2020)Plan S in Latin America: A Pr…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Funding Sources for Open Access Article Processing Charges in the Social Sciences, Arts, and Humanities in the United States (2020)Funding Sources for Open Acce…Ten myths around open scholarly publishing (2019)Ten myths around open scholar…El plan S para acelerar el acceso abierto: contexto, retos y debate generado (2019)El plan S para acelerar el ac…Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Article Processing Charge Hyp…Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario (2018)Article processing charge (AP…Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (2016)Article processing charges fo…When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? (2015)When will ‘open science’ beco…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious (2013)The Diamond Model of Open Acc…Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2008)Berlin Declaration on Open Ac…Ranking, reconocimiento y cargos por publicación (APC): criterios priorizados por investigadores del CONICET para elegir dónde publicar (2023)Ranking, reconocimiento y car…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (1977)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research (2022)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)Reinventing Discovery (2011)Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship (2020)How to write a patient case report (2006)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Open Access (2012)El proyecto de ciencia abierta en un mundo desigual (2022)Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations (2023)The oligopoly of open access publishing (2023)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Replacing academic journals (2023)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)COVID-19 in Higher Education Literature Database (CHELD V1): An open access systematic literature review database with coding rules (2020)From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2008Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities281 cited
  • 2013The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious199 cited
  • 2019Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis176 cited
  • 2016Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada134 cited
  • 2015When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’?90 cited
  • 2018Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario64 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services63 cited
  • 2020Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note39 cited
  • 2019Ten myths around open scholarly publishing24 cited
  • 2021Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Funding Sources for Open Access Article Processing Charges in the Social Sciences, Arts, and Humanities in the United States20 cited
  • 2019El plan S para acelerar el acceso abierto: contexto, retos y debate generado19 cited
  • 2021The Changing Landscape of Open Access Publishing: Can Open Access Publishing Make the Scholarly World More Equitable and Productive?17 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Ranking, reconocimiento y cargos por publicación (APC): criterios priorizados por investigadores del CONICET para elegir dónde publicar7 cited