Are Millennials Different? A Time-Lag Study of Federal Millennial and Generation X Employees’ Affective Commitment

Nhung Thi Hong Nguyen

10 citations0/0 files storedPublic Personnel Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Generational Differences and Trends Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Retirement, Disability, and Employment

Abstract

Stereotypes about Millennials permeate conversations about public management, often without evidence. Based on generational theory and psychological contract theory, this study hypothesizes and empirically compares affective commitment levels of U.S. federal Millennials and Generation Xers. This study uses a time-lag design with data from the 2011 Federal Viewpoint Survey and the 2004 Federal Human Capital Survey to investigate Millennials and Generation Xers under 30 years old and untangle the generational difference effect while controlling for the age difference. The findings show that Millennials reported slightly higher levels of affective commitment in comparison with Generation Xers (contrary to common stereotypes). This study also reports null findings or the absence of evidence for the differences regarding how managerial practices (support for work–life balance, financial rewards, and meaningful work) influence their affective commitment. In addition, federal employees belonging to the Millennial generation reported work interests differing from the common stereotypes. This study advances public management scholarship regarding affective commitment of generations and young employees, as well as contributing evidence about generational differences in an under-studied field: the public sector. Practically, the findings help reduce erroneous stereotypes and foster effective and equitable management of the public workforce.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It 1990PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.2015Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM 2002Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences 2010Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics 2018International Journal of Business and Social Science 1989Psychological and implied contracts in organizations 1995Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements

Cited by

2024Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice on Turnover Intention and the Moderating Role of Generational Differences: Evidence from Korean Public Employees 2025Comparison across X, Y and Z generation employees’ attraction and retention factors: multigroup analysis (MGA)2023PENGARUH KEPUASAN KERJA DAN MAKNA KERJA TERHADAP KOMITMEN AFEKTIF DIMODERASI RESILIENSI PADA PEKERJA MILENIAL 2026The moderating role of generational cohort on the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on the performance of non-academic staff in open distance learning institutions in Zimbabwe

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.