SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)From plagiarism to scientific paper mills…The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper …Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Web of Science and Scopus lan…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…China's Publication Bazaar (2013)China's Publication BazaarMisconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionInternationalisation of higher education in Asia Pacific countries (1997)Internationalisation of highe…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Exploratory Research (2020)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Google Earth Engine: A Global Analysis and Future Trends (2023)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Bonus Culture: Competitive Pay, Screening, and Multitasking (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2019Web of Science and Scopus language coverage388 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2013China's Publication Bazaar256 cited
  • 2021The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science251 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 1997Internationalisation of higher education in Asia Pacific countries206 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

191 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.