this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
- 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
- 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
- 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
- 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
- 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
- 2013Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA2,473 cited
- 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis1,923 cited
- 2014A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis1,812 cited
- 2014Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis1,402 cited
- 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
- 2016Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians871 cited
- 2012Automating network meta‐analysis792 cited
- 2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work