SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review
8 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review (2022)Reporting and risk of bias of prediction …Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review (2022)Completeness of reporting of …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved (2021)Reporting of prognostic clini…Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence (2021)Protocol for development of a…PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Ris…Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a Mu…Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Transparent Reporting of a mu…Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Critical Appraisal and Data E…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods (2024)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support (2023)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Appraising the Quality of Development and Reporting in Surgical Prediction Models (2022)Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation (2023)TRIPOD+AI: an updated reporting guideline for clinical prediction models (2024)TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models (2020)Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting (2021)Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice (2020)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)Reproducibility of prediction models in health services research (2022)Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review (2023)Methodological and reporting quality of machine learning studies on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration5,114 cited
  • 2014Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist2,012 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration1,663 cited
  • 2021Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence851 cited
  • 2015Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement439 cited
  • 2022Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review126 cited
  • 2021Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved110 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work