SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Science in Africa: What policymakers should consider
13 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Open Science in Africa: What policymakers should consider (2022)Open Science in Africa: What policymakers…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Open science saves lives: les…Threat of policy alienation: Exploring the implementation of Open Science policy in research practice (2020)Threat of policy alienation: …The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world (2020)The dawn of an open explorati…Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science (2020)Actionable recommendations fo…Framing Power: Tracing Key Discourses in Open Science Policies (2018)Framing Power: Tracing Key Di…Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives (2017)Motivating participation in o…How Will Open Science Impact on University-Industry Collaboration? (2017)How Will Open Science Impact …How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research (2016)How Does One “Open” Science? …Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012)Narrative approaches to syste…The A-Z of Social Research (2003)The A-Z of Social ResearchResearch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (1994)Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2003)Qualitative research: Methods in the social sciences (2006)How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit (2012)How to do a systematic review (2017)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Invisible Technician (1989)The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. (1992)Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems (2016)Facts, power and global evidence: a new empire of truth (2018)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Qualitative research & evaluation methods (2002)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The use of material transfer agreements in academia: A threat to open science or a cooperation tool? (2019)The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework (2022)Common methodological mistakes (2023)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2008)Open-Innovation Practices: Diversity in Portuguese SMEs (2021)Age effects in second language acquisition: Expanding the emergentist account (2023)What's next for responsible artificial intelligence: a way forward through responsible innovation (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers (2020)Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late! (2022)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Diffusion of innovations (2003)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Open science (2023)Heterogeneity in effect size estimates (2024)Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research (2005)Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. An Overview (2008)Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions (2017)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2012Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice589 cited
  • 2003The A-Z of Social Research419 cited
  • 2021Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic251 cited
  • 2016How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research127 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • 2020The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world105 cited
  • 2020Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science80 cited
  • 2017Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives52 cited
  • 2018Framing Power: Tracing Key Discourses in Open Science Policies45 cited
  • 2020Threat of policy alienation: Exploring the implementation of Open Science policy in research practice32 cited
  • 2017How Will Open Science Impact on University-Industry Collaboration?18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work