SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Smarter than Humans? Validating how OpenAI’s ChatGPT Model Explains Crowdfunding, Alternative Finance and Community Finance
0 references·7 citing·30 second hop
Smarter than Humans? Validating how OpenAI’s ChatGPT Model Explains Crowdfunding, Alternative Finance and Community Finance (2022)Smarter than Humans? Validating how OpenA…Unleashing the power of text for credit default prediction: Comparing human-written and generative AI-refined texts (2025)Unleashing the power of text …Does attitude towards plagiarism predict aigiarism using ChatGPT? (2024)Does attitude towards plagiar…Decoding Future of Generative AI in Finance: A Machine Learning Exploration of Academic and Grey Corpus (2024)Decoding Future of Generative…ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence (AI) for smart industry: role, challenges, and opportunities for Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and Society 5.0 (2024)ChatGPT and similar generativ…Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT (2023)Should Artificial Intelligent…Should Artificial Intelligent (AI) Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in favour, informed by ChatGPT (2023)Should Artificial Intelligent…Can ChatGPT reduce human financial analysts’ optimistic biases? (2023)Can ChatGPT reduce human fina…What is research collaboration? (1997)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Leveraging the Potential of Generative AI to Accelerate Systematic Literature Reviews: An Example in the Area of Educational Technology (2023)Can we trust LLMs to help us? An examination of the potential use of GPT-4 in generating quality literature reviews (2024)Let stochastic parrots squawk: why academic journals should allow large language models to coauthor articles (2024)Earnings predictability and bias in analysts' earnings forecasts. (1998)Inefficiency in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts: Systematic Misreaction or Systematic Optimism? (1999)Rationality and Analysts' Forecast Bias (2001)How well can ChatGPT forecast tourism demand? (2024)The role of generative AI in improving the sustainability and efficiency of HR recruitment process (2025)Research Methods in Education (2007)Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. (2011)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Relationship between the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes and plagiarism: the influence of student-related variables on cheating behavior. (2025)Understanding AIgiarism in higher education: the lens of general AI attitudes and moral disengagement (2025)Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses (2014)Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT (2023)The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning (2023)The impact of AI assimilation on firm performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: A moderated multi-mediation model (2024)A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability Integration and Marketing Intelligence in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2025)Generative AI for business sustainability: Examining usability, usefulness, and triple bottom line impacts in small and medium enterprises (2025)The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods (2009)The Sum of All FEARS Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices (2014)Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research (2015)(Generative) AI in Financial Economics (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2024ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence (AI) for smart industry: role, challenges, and opportunities for Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and Society 5.0129 cited
  • 2023Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT59 cited
  • 2023Can ChatGPT reduce human financial analysts’ optimistic biases?34 cited
  • 2024Does attitude towards plagiarism predict aigiarism using ChatGPT?33 cited
  • 2025Unleashing the power of text for credit default prediction: Comparing human-written and generative AI-refined texts27 cited
  • 2023Should Artificial Intelligent (AI) Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in favour, informed by ChatGPT13 cited
  • 2024Decoding Future of Generative AI in Finance: A Machine Learning Exploration of Academic and Grey Corpus12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work