SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results
15 references·2 citing·50 second hop
How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results (2019)How the public, and scientists, perceive …On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs (2020)On the belief that beliefs sh…The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication (2019)The gateway belief model: A l…Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox (2018)Scientific progress despite i…Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science (2018)Crisis or self-correction: Re…Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test (2016)Investigating an alternate fo…Motivated Processing (2015)Motivated ProcessingEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale (2015)Development and Validation of…I Just Don't Trust Them: The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument to Measure Trust in Science and Scientists (2014)I Just Don't Trust Them: The …Adverse Outcomes Associated With Media Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Messages (2013)Adverse Outcomes Associated W…Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement (2011)Support for climate policy an…Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale (2010)Item selection and validation…The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives (1996)The Evaluability Hypothesis: …On the evaluation of one-sided evidence (1996)On the evaluation of one-side…On the psychology of prediction. (1973)On the psychology of predicti…A brief forewarning intervention overcomes negative effects of salient changes in COVID-19 guidance (2021)A brief forewarning intervent…Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources (2020)Dealing with disagreement: Th…An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust (1995)An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust (1995)Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust (1998)Trust in Scientists on Climate Change and Vaccines (2015)The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science (2018)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. (1988)The affect heuristic (2006)Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design (2011)The need for cognition. (1982)Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. (1994)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories (2014)Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility (2017)The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999)Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values (2006)Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA (2013)The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance (2015)Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States (2016)Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making (2005)Numeracy and Decision Making (2006)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning (2018)Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking (2019)Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention (2020)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus (2019)Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science (2019)Global Warming’s Six Americas: a review and recommendations for climate change communication (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Tribalism in War and Peace: The Nature and Evolution of Ideological Epistemology and Its Significance for Modern Social Science (2020)Beliefs About COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Novel Test of Political Polarization and Motivated Reasoning (2021)The Psychology of Fake News (2021)Exposure to Health (Mis)Information: Lagged Effects on Young Adults' Health Behaviors and Potential Pathways (2015)The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis (2020)Assessment of COVID-19 Information Overload Among the General Public (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 1973On the psychology of prediction.6,201 cited
  • 1996The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives1,139 cited
  • 2016Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test612 cited
  • 2010Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale603 cited
  • 2011Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement441 cited
  • 2013Adverse Outcomes Associated With Media Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Messages289 cited
  • 2019The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication268 cited
  • 2014I Just Don't Trust Them: The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument to Measure Trust in Science and Scientists235 cited
  • 2020On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs169 cited
  • 2015Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale150 cited
  • 1996On the evaluation of one-sided evidence127 cited
  • 2015Motivated Processing93 cited
  • 2018Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox79 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science64 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources70 cited
    • 2021A brief forewarning intervention overcomes negative effects of salient changes in COVID-19 guidance13 cited