SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Terms in journal articles associating with high quality: can qualitative research be world-leading?
16 references·1 citing·55 second hop
Terms in journal articles associating with high quality: can qualitative research be world-leading? (2023)Terms in journal articles associating wit…Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)Peer Review Bias: A Critical …Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)Gender differences in peer re…Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Co-existing Notions of Resear…Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications (2018)Low agreement among reviewers…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences (2017)Generalizability in qualitati…Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians (2017)Explicit Bias Toward High-Inc…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidMapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010) (2014)Mapping the intellectual stru…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewUnderstanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Understanding current causes …The Coming of Age for Qualitative Research: Embracing the Diversity of Qualitative Methods (2011)The Coming of Age for Qualita…Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology (2010)Biased Evaluation of Abstract…Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Reproducibility of peer revie…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Can ChatGPT replace citations for quality evaluation of academic articles and journals? Empirical evidence from library and information science (2025)Can ChatGPT replace citations…The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. (1975)Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2010)Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research (2012)A Systematic Methodology for Doing Qualitative Research (2020)Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science (2005)Mapping the Research Trends by Co-word Analysis Based on Keywords from Funded Project (2016)Evolution of topics in education research: a systematic review using bibliometric analysis (2019)A Systematic Review of the Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methods (1977–2022) (2022)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. (2009)Why so Few Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (2010)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa (1959)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance and Resource Allocation in Science (2014)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)The Art of Case Study Research (1996)One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)The online survey as a qualitative research tool (2020)Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach (2024)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research (2023)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2017Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences1,436 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,412 cited
  • 2011Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science1,159 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review1,111 cited
  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review631 cited
  • 2011The Coming of Age for Qualitative Research: Embracing the Diversity of Qualitative Methods487 cited
  • 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
  • 2014Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010)230 cited
  • 2018Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications220 cited
  • 2019Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution189 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 2019Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research170 cited
  • 2019Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

165 cited
  • 2017Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians124 cited
  • 2010Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology117 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Can ChatGPT replace citations for quality evaluation of academic articles and journals? Empirical evidence from library and information science6 cited