SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethics: disclose use of AI in scientific manuscripts
0 references·6 citing·17 second hop
Ethics: disclose use of AI in scientific manuscripts (2023)Ethics: disclose use of AI in scientific …The ethical implications of Chatbot developments for conservation expertise (2024)The ethical implications of C…Ten simple rules to leverage large language models for getting grants (2024)Ten simple rules to leverage …AI chatbots contribute to global conservation injustices (2024)AI chatbots contribute to glo…What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 (2023)What is the rate of text gene…Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis (2023)Human-Written vs AI-Generated…Could ChatGPT help you to write your next scientific paper?: concerns on research ethics related to usage of artificial intelligence tools (2023)Could ChatGPT help you to wri…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Analyzing AI use policy in LIS: association with journal metrics and publisher volume (2024)Man Versus Machine: A Comparative Study of Human and ChatGPT-Generated Abstracts in Plastic Surgery Research (2025)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)Evaluating human ability to distinguish between ChatGPT-generated and original scientific abstracts (2025)Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America (2000)Designs for the Pluriverse (2018)Review of “Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code” (2019)Beyond the Hype: Navigating the Conservation Implications of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science (2012)Accuracy pecking order – How 30 AI detectors stack up in detecting generative artificial intelligence content in university English L1 and English L2 student essays (2024)AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT. (2024)Human Reviewers' Ability to Differentiate Human-Authored or Artificial Intelligence–Generated Medical Manuscripts (2025)The artificial intelligence revolution...in unethical publishing: Will AI worsen our dysfunctional publishing system? (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2023What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 202237 cited
  • 2024AI chatbots contribute to global conservation injustices34 cited
  • 2023Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis29 cited
  • 2023Could ChatGPT help you to write your next scientific paper?: concerns on research ethics related to usage of artificial intelligence tools25 cited
  • 2024Ten simple rules to leverage large language models for getting grants14 cited
  • 2024The ethical implications of Chatbot developments for conservation expertise13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work