SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Political Biases of ChatGPT
0 references·16 citing·54 second hopsampled
The Political Biases of ChatGPT (2023)The Political Biases of ChatGPTThe impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context (2025)The impact of generative AI o…Will Artificial Intelligence Affect How Cultural Heritage Will Be Managed in the Future? Responses Generated by Four genAI Models (2024)Will Artificial Intelligence …The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT (2024)The Self-Perception and Polit…The political preferences of LLMs (2024)The political preferences of …Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation (2024)Navigating the perils of arti…Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on art creation and collaboration: Benefits, challenges and ethical implications (2024)Exploring the impact of ChatG…Ethical dimensions of generative AI: a cross-domain analysis using machine learning structural topic modeling (2024)Ethical dimensions of generat…Ethical considerations and policy interventions concerning the impact of generative AI tools in the economy and in society (2024)Ethical considerations and po…Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024)Diminished diversity-of-thoug…An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage (2024)An integrative decision-makin…AI Psychometrics: Assessing the Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models Through Psychometric Inventories (2024)AI Psychometrics: Assessing t…What ChatGPT Tells Us about Gender: A Cautionary Tale about Performativity and Gender Biases in AI (2023)What ChatGPT Tells Us about G…The Social Impact of Generative AI: An Analysis on ChatGPT (2023)The Social Impact of Generati…The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT (2023)The Limitations and Ethical C…Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT (2023)Revisiting the political bias…Factors Predicting Intentions of Adoption and Continued Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Mental Health: Examining the Role of UTAUT Model, Stigma, Privacy Concerns, and Artificial Intelligence Hesitancy (2023)Factors Predicting Intentions…The Psychic Life of Power (1997)Undoing Gender (2004)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)AI hype as a cyber security risk: the moral responsibility of implementing generative AI in business (2024)Evaluating and addressing demographic disparities in medical large language models: a systematic review (2025)Navigating LLM ethics: advancements, challenges, and future directions (2025)The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other (1984)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias (2023)A Systematic Review and Analysis of Ethical Challenges of Generative Ai: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (2024)Seeking Emotional and Mental Health Support From Generative AI: Mixed-Methods Study of ChatGPT User Experiences (2025)The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective (2025)Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1 (2001)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1 (2012)Exploring artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots adoption among research scholars using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) (2024)State of the Science: Using Digital Mental Health Interventions to Extend the Impact of Psychological Services (2024)Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: the sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy (2025)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers (2024)A Multifaceted Vision of the Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Review (2025)Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries (1992)Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2008)Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)How do people react to political bias in generative artificial intelligence (AI)? (2024)Six Fallacies in Substituting Large Language Models for Human Participants (2025)The high-dimensional psychological profile of ChatGPT (2025)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning (2024)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do? (2025)Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts (1997)Strategic Management (2010)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)‘As of my last knowledge update’: How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals? (2024)AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content (2024)Effects of consumer suspicion: a review and agenda for future research (2024)The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). (1962)The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy (2002)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)The Silence of the LLMs: Cross-Lingual Analysis of Political Bias and False Information Prevalence in ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing Chat (2023)ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks (2023)Assessing political bias and value misalignment in generative artificial intelligence (2025)Measuring gender and racial biases in large language models: Intersectional evidence from automated resume evaluation (2025)Source framing triggers systematic bias in large language models (2025)Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (1998)Research Methods in Education (2002)Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education (2005)Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI: a case study of faculty perspectives (2025)Exploring the Factors That Promote a Balance Between Academic Integrity and the Effective Use of GenAI Tools in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2025)Redefining assessment tasks to promote students’ creativity and integrity in the age of generative artificial intelligence (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2025The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context203 cited
  • 2023What ChatGPT Tells Us about Gender: A Cautionary Tale about Performativity and Gender Biases in AI161 cited
  • 2023The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT120 cited
  • 2023The Social Impact of Generative AI: An Analysis on ChatGPT116 cited
  • 2024AI Psychometrics: Assessing the Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models Through Psychometric Inventories97 cited
  • 2024The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT94 cited
  • 2024The political preferences of LLMs86 cited
  • 2024Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model83 cited
  • 2023Factors Predicting Intentions of Adoption and Continued Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Mental Health: Examining the Role of UTAUT Model, Stigma, Privacy Concerns, and Artificial Intelligence Hesitancy81 cited
  • 2024Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation64 cited
  • 2024Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on art creation and collaboration: Benefits, challenges and ethical implications55 cited
  • 2024Ethical considerations and policy interventions concerning the impact of generative AI tools in the economy and in society54 cited
  • 2024Will Artificial Intelligence Affect How Cultural Heritage Will Be Managed in the Future? Responses Generated by Four genAI Models

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

45 cited
  • 2024Ethical dimensions of generative AI: a cross-domain analysis using machine learning structural topic modeling44 cited
  • 2024An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage43 cited
  • 2023Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT42 cited