SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence
0 references·8 citing·29 second hop
The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence (2008)The Judicial Assessment of Expert EvidenceRix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence (2020)Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evid…Introducing Social Science Evidence in Family Court Decision-Making and Adjudication: Evidence from England and Wales (2019)Introducing Social Science Ev…Prueba pericial y su impacto en los errores del sistema de justicia penal: antecedentes comparados y locales para iniciar el debate (2018)Prueba pericial y su impacto …Expert Testimony, Law and Epistemic Authority (2016)Expert Testimony, Law and Epi…Robust Trust in Expert Testimony (2015)Robust Trust in Expert Testim…Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence (2015)Legal versus non-legal approa…‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales? (2015)‘A new and more rigorous appr…Fundamental Principles of Civil Procedure: Order Out of Chaos (2012)Fundamental Principles of Civ…The German Advantage in Civil Procedure (1985)The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (1987)The judicial process in comparative perspective (1990)A Treatise on Probability (1973)Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview (1992)Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)In Defence of Ockhamism (2011)The Truth About the Future (2013)Future Contingents are all False! On Behalf of a Russellian Open Future (2016)States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (2004)The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)The University of Chicago Law Review (2017)Forensic Science Decision-Making (2024)Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action (1999)Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy (2006)Epistemic authority: a theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief (2013)Getting Told and Being Believed (2006)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Epistemic Authority (2012)Communication, forensic science, and the law (2020)Convicting the innocent: where criminal prosecutions go wrong (2011)The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions (2012)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)Law as last resort : prosecution decision-making in a regulatory agency (2002)Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency (2003)Women who Kill their Children (1979)Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (1988)The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Robust Trust in Expert Testimony44 cited
  • 2016Expert Testimony, Law and Epistemic Authority31 cited
  • 2015Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence25 cited
  • 2015‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?22 cited
  • 2018Prueba pericial y su impacto en los errores del sistema de justicia penal: antecedentes comparados y locales para iniciar el debate22 cited
  • 2019Introducing Social Science Evidence in Family Court Decision-Making and Adjudication: Evidence from England and Wales17 cited
  • 2020Rix's Expert Psychiatric Evidence16 cited
  • 2012Fundamental Principles of Civil Procedure: Order Out of Chaos13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work