SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process (2023)Publishing review reports to reveal and p…Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research (2022)Should open access lead to cl…Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Exploratory analysis of text …Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers (2021)Predatory publishers’ latest …Unlock ways to share data on peer review (2020)Unlock ways to share data on …Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial (2020)Nature will publish peer revi…Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Demarcating spectrums of pred…The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The effect of publishing peer…Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965 (2019)Managing the Growth of Peer R…Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States (2018)Scientific Autonomy, Public A…Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times (2017)Quantifying the effect of edi…Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers? (2017)Does single blind peer review…A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations (2016)A Large-Scale Analysis of Imp…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…How Professors Think (2009)How Professors ThinkThe Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Pe…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Sociology of Science: The…THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN (1951)Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (1979)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Four Decades of Research in Alzheimer’s Disease (1975–2014): A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis (2017)The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors (2019)Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation (2022)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model (2017)How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management (2020)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers (1991)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)Stop evaluating science: A historical-sociological argument (2021)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2021)Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals (2021)Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches (1995)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Closing the knowledge‐action gap in conservation with open science (2021)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS (2023)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)Publish or impoverish (2017)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay (1984)Intersectionality as buzzword (2008)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)Hiring as Cultural Matching (2012)Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation (2012)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1974The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations4,004 cited
  • 2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
  • 2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
  • 2018Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States163 cited
  • 2022Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research120 cited
  • 2020Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy97 cited
  • 2016A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations92 cited
  • 2017Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?62 cited
  • 2021Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers57 cited
  • 2020Unlock ways to share data on peer review55 cited
  • 2017Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times55 cited
  • 2022Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills43 cited
  • 2019Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

36 cited
  • 2020Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial30 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.