SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Depression trial results: A cross-sectional study of ClinicalTrials.gov
7 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Depression trial results: A cross-sectional study of ClinicalTrials.gov (2023)Depression trial results: A cross-section…Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta‐analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients (2023)Cognitive behavior therapy vs…Transparency of results reporting for depression treatment studies in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study (2021)Transparency of results repor…The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases (2019)The Meaningfulness of Effect …The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression (2018)The cumulative effect of repo…Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials (2015)Does Publication Bias Inflate…“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…A power primer. (1992)A power primer.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adolescent Depression (2016)Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses based on clinical study reports (2016)The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses (2022)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture (2019)More treatment but no less depression: The treatment-prevalence paradox (2021)Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda (2023)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology (2019)Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology (2021)Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science (2021)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Economic Burden of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010) (2015)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Treatment with psychedelics is psychotherapy: beyond reductionism (2023)The future of psychological treatments: The Marburg Declaration (2024)Generative AI–Enabled Therapy Support Tool for Improved Clinical Outcomes and Patient Engagement in Group Therapy: Real-World Observational Study (2025)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration1 (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A power primer.42,571 cited
  • 2019The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases773 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2023Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta‐analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients352 cited
  • 2015Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials208 cited
  • 2018The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression99 cited
  • 2021Transparency of results reporting for depression treatment studies in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work