SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Measure Technology Dominance in AI-supported Human decision-making
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Measure Technology Dominance in AI-supported Human decision-making (2023)AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Meas…Modeling adoption of intelligent agents in medical imaging (2022)Modeling adoption of intellig…Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “Selective Adherence” to Algorithmic Advice (2022)Human–AI Interactions in Publ…Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for Teamwork (2021)Is the Most Accurate AI the B…In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence (2020)In AI we trust? Perceptions a…Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Three Fresh Ideas (2020)Human-Centered Artificial Int…A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2020)A Research Agenda for Hybrid …A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores (2020)A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop…Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way (2019)Responsible Artificial Intell…Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment (2019)Algorithm appreciation: Peopl…Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted? (2017)Understanding algorithm avers…Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review (2016)Automation bias and verificat…The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments (2009)The relative influence of adv…Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences (2006)Advice taking and decision-ma…Accountability and automation bias (2000)Accountability and automation…A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation (2000)A model for types and levels …The New Economics: For Industry, Government, Education (1996)The New Economics: For Indust…Psychological Traits and Appropriate Reliance: Factors Shaping Trust in AI (2024)Psychological Traits and Appr…Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010)Trust in Automation (2014)Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (2015)Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy (2020)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Evolution of Cooperation (1981)Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. (2016)Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them (2016)Forecasting: theory and practice (2022)Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review (1989)Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) (2019)Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How should intelligent agents apologize to restore trust? Interaction effects between anthropomorphism and apology attribution on trust repair (2021)‘Just like I thought’: Street‐level bureaucrats trust AI recommendations if they confirm their professional judgment (2023)Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI (2025)The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations (2004)The trouble with overconfidence. (2008)Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err (2014)Human Decisions and Machine Predictions (2017)Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management (2018)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (2016)What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion (2021)The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust (2022)Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions (2024)Human Factors of the Confirmation Bias in Intelligence Analysis: Decision Support From Graphical Evidence Landscapes (2008)Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design (2015)Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development (2022)Human-AI Ensembles: When Can They Work? (2023)A sociotechnical system perspective on AI (2024)Technics and Civilization. (1934)Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers (2000)Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (2017)Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience (2021)A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective (2022)What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape (2023)Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (2018)Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification (2018)Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study (2022)Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: challenges and opportunities (2023)Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys (1999)The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century (2004)Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation4,175 cited
  • 2019Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment2,045 cited
  • 1996The New Economics: For Industry, Government, Education1,449 cited
  • 2020In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence1,036 cited
  • 2006Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences1,007 cited
  • 2022Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “Selective Adherence” to Algorithmic Advice462 cited
  • 2016Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review447 cited
  • 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Three Fresh Ideas427 cited
  • 2020A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence412 cited
  • 2009The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments341 cited
  • 2000Accountability and automation bias324 cited
  • 2017Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted?308 cited
  • 2019Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way262 cited
  • 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

221 cited
  • 2021Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for Teamwork123 cited
  • 2022Modeling adoption of intelligent agents in medical imaging110 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Psychological Traits and Appropriate Reliance: Factors Shaping Trust in AI50 cited