References

• 2013Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective967 cited
• 2008To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing842 cited
• 2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
• 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
• 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited
• 2014How Diversity Works211 cited
• 2019Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM189 cited
• 2019Who is telling the story? A systematic review of authorship for infectious disease research conducted in Africa, 1980–2016154 cited
• 2013Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities100 cited
• 2022Strengthening research capacity: a systematic review of manuscript writing and publishing interventions for researchers in low-income and middle-income countries85 cited
• 2014WAC and Second-Language Writers: Research Towards Linguistically and Culturally Inclusive Programs and Practices76 cited
• 2014Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials75 cited
• 2009Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers