SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES
16 references·6 citing·34 second hop
ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES (2023)ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS …Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers (2021)Predatory publishers’ latest …Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory pub…How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)How is open access accused of…Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Demarcating spectrums of pred…Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2020)Defining predatory journals a…Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Checklists to detect potentia…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)Predatory and exploitative be…Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Knowledge and motivations of …Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Why do authors publish in pre…What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …Format Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals (2018)Format Aside: Applying Beall'…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals (2017)Identifying predatory or pseu…“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)“Predatory” Open-Access Schol…Guidelines for retracting articles (2009)Guidelines for retracting art…Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative (2025)Scientometric indicators in r…The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China's global scientific rise (2024)The Chinese Early Warning Jou…Retraction handling by potential predatory journals (2024)Retraction handling by potent…What does ChatGPT advise about predatory publishing? (2023)What does ChatGPT advise abou…The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier (2023)The Classification of Q1 SJR-…An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory (2023)An artificial intelligence to…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? (2017)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases (2021)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)Who Counts? (2023)Is circular economy a failing sustainability paradigm? Not necessarily (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2018Why do authors publish in predatory journals?257 cited
  • 2009Guidelines for retracting articles185 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review156 cited
  • 2019Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey154 cited
  • 2017Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals146 cited
  • 2020Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review138 cited
  • 2020How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing128 cited
  • 2020Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences123 cited
  • 2020Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process104 cited
  • 2020Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy97 cited
  • 2010“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers89 cited
  • 2019Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment77 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Format Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals
65 cited
  • 2021Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers57 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative14 cited
    • 2023The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier11 cited
    • 2023An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory10 cited
    • 2023What does ChatGPT advise about predatory publishing?9 cited
    • 2024The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China's global scientific rise8 cited
    • 2024Retraction handling by potential predatory journals8 cited