SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors’ and Publishers’ Responsibilities
3 references·1 citing·15 second hop
ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors’ and Publishers’ Responsibilities (2023)ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals i…Is ChatGPT a valid author? (2023)Is ChatGPT a valid author?Human‐ and AI ‐based authorship: Principles and ethics (2023)Human‐ and AI ‐based authorsh…Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…When using Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scientific Publications Authors should include the Prompts and the Generated Text as Part of the Submission (2024)When using Artificial Intelli…ChatGPT and the rise of semi-humans (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses (2023)Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing (2023)Let stochastic parrots squawk: why academic journals should allow large language models to coauthor articles (2024)A Delphi Study on Ethical Challenges and Ensuring Academic Integrity Regarding AI Research in Higher Education (2025)Responsible use of AI in social science research (2025)The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2023Is ChatGPT a valid author?72 cited
  • 2023Human‐ and AI ‐based authorship: Principles and ethics34 cited

Cited by

  • 2024When using Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scientific Publications Authors should include the Prompts and the Generated Text as Part of the Submission18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work