SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A decade of changes in OA and non-OA journal publication and production
16 references·1 citing·49 second hop
A decade of changes in OA and non-OA journal publication and production (2023)A decade of changes in OA and non-OA jour…Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research (2022)Should open access lead to cl…What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis (2021)What happens when a journal c…Adoption of the Open Access Business Model in Scientific Journal Publishing: A Cross-disciplinary Study (2020)Adoption of the Open Access B…The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing (2019)The pricing of open access jo…Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Why do authors publish in pre…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals (2018)Publishing speed and acceptan…Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers (2018)Inequality in Knowledge Produ…Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017 (2018)Evolution of the scholarly me…Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science (2017)Predatory Publishing Is a Thr…What does ‘green’ open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies (2016)What does ‘green’ open access…Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study (2016)Hybrid open access—A longitud…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution (2013)The Open Access Movement Grow…A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)A new approach to the metric …Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing (2025)Inequity, precarity, and disp…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus (2016)Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016 (2017)Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research (2018)Will open access increase journal CiteScores? An empirical investigation over multiple disciplines (2018)Open Access (2012)Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? (2015)Open-access mega-journals (2017)Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary (2022)The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals (2023)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition (1974)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States (2020)Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation (2022)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)Publish or impoverish (2017)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2010A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator863 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2018Why do authors publish in predatory journals?257 cited
  • 2016Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study126 cited
  • 2022Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research120 cited
  • 2018Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers111 cited
  • 2018Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–201766 cited
  • 2019The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing64 cited
  • 2016What does ‘green’ open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies64 cited
  • 2021What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis48 cited
  • 2020Adoption of the Open Access Business Model in Scientific Journal Publishing: A Cross-disciplinary Study44 cited
  • 2017Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science42 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2013The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution39 cited
  • 2018Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals37 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing9 cited