SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating grant proposals: lessons from using metrics as screening device
16 references·0 citing·51 second hopsampled
Evaluating grant proposals: lessons from using metrics as screening device (2023)Evaluating grant proposals: lessons from …Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Papers and patents are becomi…The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)The Journal Impact Factor: A …Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (2018)Trends in Russian research ou…Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? (2015)Big names or big ideas: Do pe…Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Accountability in context: ef…The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009) (2013)The globalization of social s…Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices (2012)Conservatism and risk-taking …The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity (2011)The impact of research grant …Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Funding grant proposals for s…University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)University research funding a…Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (2010)Bibliometrics as a Performanc…The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…Persistent nepotism in peer-review (2007)Persistent nepotism in peer-r…The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions (2006)The art of getting funded: ho…Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Is it possible to compare res…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Progress and its problems towards a theory of scientific growth (1977)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge (1999)Bias in peer review (2012)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (1983)Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university (1998)The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia (2002)Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research (2009)Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies (2021)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1979)The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1979)External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective (2011)Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality (2015)Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance (2018)Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature (2018)Real Effects of Academic Research (1989)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation (2015)A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation (2019)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Econometric policy evaluation: A critique (1976)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers (2025)Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments (1986)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Serious Games and Gamification in Healthcare: A Meta-Review (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,780 cited
  • 2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time1,027 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review824 cited
  • 2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
  • 2011The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity543 cited
  • 2010University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison517 cited
  • 2006The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions287 cited
  • 2019The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects282 cited
  • 2015Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?225 cited
  • 2012Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices197 cited
  • 2014Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University184 cited
  • 2007Persistent nepotism in peer-review178 cited
  • 2013The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009)175 cited
  • 2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada
159 cited
  • 2018Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science141 cited
  • 2011Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel140 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.