SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analyzing the Scholarly Footprint of ChatGPT: Mapping the Progress and Identifying Future Trends
11 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Analyzing the Scholarly Footprint of ChatGPT: Mapping the Progress and Identifying Future Trends (2023)Analyzing the Scholarly Footprint of Chat…Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threate…How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses (2023)How trustworthy is ChatGPT? T…Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education (2023)Collaborating With ChatGPT: C…ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive revi…ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on r…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT …How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future? (2020)Artificial Intelligence (AI) …bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)bibliometrix : An R-tool for …Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT? (2023)Can we identify prominent sch…CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)The g factor: the science of mental ability (1998)Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) (2004)How Artificial Intelligence Is Promoting Financial Inclusion? A Study On Barriers Of Financial Inclusion (2022)Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Management System: Exploring the Risks and Options for Constructing a Theoretical Foundation (2023)Using artificial intelligence to implement the UN sustainable development goals at higher education institutions (2024)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)The Janus Effect of Generative AI: Charting the Path for Responsible Conduct of Scholarly Activities in Information Systems (2023)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT (2024)Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence? (2023)Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions (2024)The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda (2024)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping21,418 cited
  • 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis16,195 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines14,255 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope2,455 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2023Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education970 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
  • 2023Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists610 cited
  • 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
  • 2020Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future?348 cited
  • 2023How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses57 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT?12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work