SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Simulation-based Active Learning for Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review of Literature
16 references·1 citing·35 second hop
Simulation-based Active Learning for Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review of Literature (2023)Simulation-based Active Learning for Syst…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence and t…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation (2020)SWIFT-Active Screener: Accele…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers (2015)Faster title and abstract scr…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Reducing systematic review workload through certainty-based screening (2014)Reducing systematic review wo…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)Applications of text mining w…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…Addressing the challenges of reconstructing systematic reviews datasets: a case study and a noisy label filter procedure (2024)Addressing the challenges of …The American Heritage Word Frequency Book (1973)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review430 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
  • 2021Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews298 cited
  • 2011Applications of text mining within systematic reviews212 cited
  • 2014Reducing systematic review workload through certainty-based screening190 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers184 cited
  • 2020SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation157 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Addressing the challenges of reconstructing systematic reviews datasets: a case study and a noisy label filter procedure14 cited