SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 1)
16 references·0 citing·29 second hopsampled
Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 1) (2023)Seeking adverse effects in systematic rev…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review (2016)Reporting of Adverse Events i…PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)PRISMA harms checklist: impro…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review (2014)Quality of reporting in syste…Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension (2013)Reporting of harms data in RC…Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review (2013)Adherence to CONSORT Adverse …Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review (2012)Adherence to CONSORT harms-re…The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2010)The quality of safety reporti…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results (2008)Reporting of adverse events i…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review (2020)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials (2023)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,960 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,139 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews12,409 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,591 cited
  • 2016PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews555 cited
  • 2016Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review284 cited
  • 2014Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review220 cited
  • 2013Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review132 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
111 cited
  • 2010The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals84 cited
  • 2012Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review65 cited
  • 2008Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results64 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.