SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An analysis of randomized controlled trials on anal fistula conducted between 2000 and 2020 based on the Fragility Index and Reverse Fragility Index
9 references·0 citing·40 second hop
An analysis of randomized controlled trials on anal fistula conducted between 2000 and 2020 based on the Fragility Index and Reverse Fragility Index (2023)An analysis of randomized controlled tria…Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties (2022)Statistical robustness of ran…Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results (2022)Paediatric surgical trials, t…New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the Journal (2019)New Guidelines for Statistica…The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery (2018)The fragility of statisticall…Assessing quality of randomized trials supporting guidelines for laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery (2018)Assessing quality of randomiz…Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)Fragility of Results in Ophth…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, controlled trials in surgery (2001)Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies (2001)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Survey (2021)Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package (2022)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Predictors of Increased Fragility Index Scores in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: An Umbrella Review (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews (2020)The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review (2021)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review (2021)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough (2012)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)Randomized Controlled Trials in ICU in the Four Highest-Impact General Medicine Journals (2023)How to run an experimental auction: a review of recent advances (2019)How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research (2022)Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 2019New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the Journal339 cited
  • 2017Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials53 cited
  • 2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery32 cited
  • 2018Assessing quality of randomized trials supporting guidelines for laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery16 cited
  • 2022Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties14 cited
  • 2022Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work