SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Methodological Quality Scale (MQS) for intervention programs: validity evidence
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
The Methodological Quality Scale (MQS) for intervention programs: validity evidence (2023)The Methodological Quality Scale (MQS) fo…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Handbook of Research Synt…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (2018)The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educ…The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science (2018)The replicability crisis and …Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions (2017)Program FACTOR at 10: Origins…Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis (2017)Assessing the Quality and App…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions (2012)Issues relating to study desi…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. (2011)Dimensionality assessment of …Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2008)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables (2008)Polychoric versus Pearson cor…A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD). (2008)A systematic and transparent …Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Adjustment of meta-analyses o…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)LISREL 7 : user's reference guide (1989)Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989)Structural Equations with Latent Variables. (1991)Current Methodological Considerations in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2011)Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (2016)Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice (2019)The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis (1960)The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors (1966)Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (1992)Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research (2017)A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale (2018)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)How Many Studies Do You Need? (2009)Travel and the Built Environment (2010)Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2015)Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges (2019)New Silk Road infrastructure opportunities in developing tourism environment for residents better quality of life (2020)Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach (2023)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
  • 2011Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis.1,632 cited
  • 2018The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation1,471 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis1,293 cited
  • 2008Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables1,176 cited
  • 2017Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis587 cited
  • 2017Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions535 cited
  • 2006Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned207 cited
  • 2008A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

183 cited
  • 2012Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions183 cited
  • 2018The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science146 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.