SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The SAFE Procedure: A Practical Stopping Heuristic for Active Learning-Based Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The SAFE Procedure: A Practical Stopping Heuristic for Active Learning-Based Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2023)The SAFE Procedure: A Practical Stopping …Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews (2021)Research Screener: a machine …An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation (2020)SWIFT-Active Screener: Accele…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes (2020)An evaluation of DistillerSR’…A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)A full systematic review was …Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence (2018)Using machine learning to adv…Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study (2018)Prioritising references for s…Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis (2018)Is your dataset big enough? S…Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews (2018)Finding better active learner…A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…Automating Biomedical Evidence Synthesis: RobotReviewer (2017)Automating Biomedical Evidenc…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques (2009)Literature searching for soci…Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in adult bereavement: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students (2019)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS (1984)Applied choice analysis a primer (2005)A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for modeling travel mode choice (2017)A hybrid SEM-neural network analysis of social media addiction (2019)Choice modelling in the age of machine learning - Discussion paper (2021)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT ‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages (2024)Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (2024)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2022)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study685 cited
  • 2018Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis523 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
  • 2009Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques318 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews214 cited
  • 2021Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews190 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited
  • 2020SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation157 cited
  • 2018Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence155 cited
  • 2018Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study148 cited
  • 2020An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes139 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews106 cited
  • 2017Automating Biomedical Evidence Synthesis: RobotReviewer96 cited
  • 2018Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews83 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.