Unraveling controversies over civic honesty measurement: An extended field replication in China

Qian Yang · Weiwei Zhang · Shiyong Liu · Youli Han · Jun Lu · Donghong Jiang +9 more

20 citations0/0 files storedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Cultural Differences and Values Culture, Economy, and Development Studies

Abstract

Cohn et al. (2019) conducted a wallet drop experiment in 40 countries to measure "civic honesty around the globe," which has received worldwide attention but also sparked controversies over using the email response rate as the sole metric of civic honesty. Relying on the lone measurement may overlook cultural differences in behaviors that demonstrate civic honesty. To investigate this issue, we conducted an extended replication study in China, utilizing email response and wallet recovery to assess civic honesty. We found a significantly higher level of civic honesty in China, as measured by the wallet recovery rate, than reported in the original study, while email response rates remained similar. To resolve the divergent results, we introduce a cultural dimension, individualism versus collectivism, to study civic honesty across diverse cultures. We hypothesize that cultural differences in individualism and collectivism could influence how individuals prioritize actions when handling a lost wallet, such as contacting the wallet owner or safeguarding the wallet. In reanalyzing Cohn et al.'s data, we found that email response rates were inversely related to collectivism indices at the country level. However, our replication study in China demonstrated that the likelihood of wallet recovery was positively correlated with collectivism indicators at the provincial level. Consequently, relying solely on email response rates to gauge civic honesty in cross-country comparisons may neglect the vital individualism versus collectivism dimension. Our study not only helps reconcile the controversy surrounding Cohn et al.'s influential field experiment but also furnishes a fresh cultural perspective to evaluate civic honesty.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science 2002Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.2010Cultures and Organizations, Software of the mind. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for survival 1998Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism.1996Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.1996Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.1987The psychology of the Chinese people 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.