Articlediamond2023

Ethics of artificial intelligence

Carlos Alberto Rios-Campos · Mariuxi Ileana Tejada-Castro · Jessica Del Consuelo Luzuriaga Viteri · Erick Orlando Guerrero Zambrano · Jorge Bautista Núñez · Flor Elizabeth Obregón Vara

19 citations0/0 files storedSouth Florida Journal of Development

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Artificial Intelligence Applications

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to determine the advances related to the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. The most powerful countries are investing large amounts of economic resources in the development of artificial intelligence. Methodology, in this research, 49 documents have been selected, carried out in the period 2018 - 2023; including: scientific articles, review articles and information from websites of recognized organizations. Results, the ethics of artificial intelligence is supported by various countries. Furthermore, ChatGPT is considered a major threat in the automation of academic document preparation. Conclusions, about the general objective of the research is to determine the advances related to the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, it is important to consider the transparency and risks of applying AI. In addition, consider ethical aspects such as the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence was adopted by UNESCO's General Conference at its 41st session. The European Union (EU) is considering a new legal framework about regulations on the development and use of artificial intelligence. ChatGPT is an AI tool that needs to be carefully evaluated for its impact on education and other human activities. About the first specific objective of the research was to identify the countries that invest the most money in artificial intelligence, there are Japan, Singapore, China, India, Russia, Australia, Unite States of America, and the European Union. About the second specific objective of the research was to determine the risks and requirements of artificial intelligence, the risks are black-box models, privacy violations, bias and discrimination and the requirements are algorithmic transparency, human understandable explanations, privacy-preserving algorithms, data cooperatives, algorithmic fairness.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

2023Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy 2023ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing 2020Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics 2020Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications 2021The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation 2017Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence 2021Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence 2022Artificial Intelligence in Africa: Emerging Challenges

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.