SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An emerging field: An evaluation of biomedical graduate student and postdoctoral education and training research across seven decades
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
An emerging field: An evaluation of biomedical graduate student and postdoctoral education and training research across seven decades (2023)An emerging field: An evaluation of biome…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists (2020)Unequal effects of the COVID-…An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research (2019)An overview of the qualitativ…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity (2015)National Institutes of Health…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Expectations of brilliance un…Relationships Among Positive Emotions, Coping, Resilience and Mental Health (2014)Relationships Among Positive …Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers (2014)Gender Differences in Time Sp…Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women (2014)Elite male faculty in the lif…A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)A unified approach to mapping…Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Defining an Identity (2004)Defining an IdentityStatistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Statistical bibliography or b…Department of Labor (1941)Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2008)Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method * (2010)Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014 (2015)Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools (2016)Women Physicians and Promotion in Academic Medicine (2020)Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. (1995)Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (2000)The gender similarities hypothesis. (2005)Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? (2016)Gender Stereotypes (2017)A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019)Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis (2010)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures (2009)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings (2021)The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research (2022)A Worked Example of Qualitative Descriptive Design: A Step‐by‐Step Guide for Novice and Early Career Researchers (2024)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping24,911 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies23,532 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,591 cited
  • 1969Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics3,301 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,539 cited
  • 2010A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks2,462 cited
  • 2019An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research2,419 cited
  • 2015Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines1,647 cited
  • 2014Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers827 cited
  • 2020Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists765 cited
  • 2014Relationships Among Positive Emotions, Coping, Resilience and Mental Health528 cited
  • 2014Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women438 cited
  • 2015National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

391 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2004Defining an Identity137 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.