Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say?

9 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
2023Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT3,054 cited
2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
2023Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond834 cited
2023From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing795 cited
2023ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?531 cited
2022How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research487 cited
2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection259 cited
2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited

Cited by

2024GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI215 cited
2024Here, There and Everywhere: On the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Management Research and the Peer‐Review Process79 cited
2024Examining awareness, social influence, and perceived enjoyment in the TAM framework as determinants of ChatGPT. Personalization as a moderator60 cited
2025ChatGPT in Academia: University Students’ Attitudes Towards the use of ChatGPT and Plagiarism

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

47 cited

2024Artificial Intelligence in Newsrooms: Ethical Challenges Facing Journalists42 cited

2024Does attitude towards plagiarism predict aigiarism using ChatGPT?33 cited

2025ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 202333 cited

2023A structural model of student continuance intentions in ChatGPT adoption27 cited

2024Students’ perceptions, attitudes and utilisation of ChatGPT for academic dishonesty: Multigroup analyses via PLS‒SEM27 cited

2024How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications?23 cited

2025Factors influencing international students’ adoption of generative artificial intelligence22 cited

2025Proposing a framework for ethical use of AI in academic writing based on a conceptual review: implications for quality education19 cited

2024Digital Ink and Surgical Dreams: Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence–Generated Essays in Residency Applications18 cited

2024Evolution of Research Reporting Standards: Adapting to the Influence of Artificial Intelligence, Statistics Software, and Writing Tools17 cited

2024ChatGPT e outras IAs transformarão a pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre seus usos17 cited

2024ChatGPT as a coping mechanism for social isolation: An analysis of user experiences and perceptions of social support15 cited