Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

6. Conceptual Disruption and the Ethics of Technology

15 references·3 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1971A Theory of Justice9,452 cited
1956IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts2,278 cited
2000Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?1,568 cited
2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change956 cited
2017The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS)566 cited
2018Robot Rights420 cited
2010Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration390 cited
2013Replacing Truth389 cited
2013Conceptual Ethics I308 cited
2018Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics286 cited
2020What is conceptual engineering and what should it be?227 cited
2013Conceptual Ethics II173 cited
2023Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology: Amelioration or Adaptation?45 cited
2022Technology as Driver for Morally Motivated Conceptual Engineering25 cited
2021Tracing Long-term Value Change in (Energy) Technologies: Opportunities of Probabilistic Topic Models Using Large Data Sets21 cited

Cited by

2024

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What is conceptual disruption?

21 cited

2025The distinction between generic and specific concepts and why it matters for conceptual engineering1 cited

2026Conceptualising conceptual resilience. A comparative approach1 cited