From distinctiveness to optimal distinctiveness: External endorsements, innovativeness and new venture funding

Kazem Mochkabadi · Simon Kleinert · Diemo Urbig · Christine Katharina Volkmann

49 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Business Venturing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Private Equity and Venture Capital Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Abstract

We examine how external endorsements help new ventures with varying degrees of innovativeness to attract funding. According to optimal distinctiveness theory, new ventures should be as different from competitors as legitimately possible. However, initial research suggests that new ventures can also buffer their legitimacy through external endorsements. We clarify that effects of such legitimacy buffers depend critically on an audience's unique legitimacy-distinctiveness relationship. Specifically, external endorsements lead to different predictions about shifts in optimal distinctiveness for return-seeking audiences compared to novelty-seeking audiences as relevant new venture funders. For return-seeking audiences, new ventures are perceived as less legitimate when they are non-innovative or radically innovative so that incrementally innovative new ventures are most attractive without endorsements. External endorsements can thus buffer the legitimacy of non-innovative and radically innovative new ventures, but they lead to different performance implications for a return-seeking audience. While non-innovative new ventures increase their attractiveness, only radically innovative new ventures can become optimally distinctive and outperform other distinctiveness configurations. In contrast, novelty-seeking audiences already have a higher tolerance for radically innovative new ventures, so the effects of external endorsements are less pronounced. Four empirical studies, using observational data and experiments in equity and reward-based crowdfunding, provide strong support for this theory and account for alternative explanations such as risk perceptions. In turn, we shed new light on the crucial, audience-specific function of external endorsements, namely, as a means to alter optimal distinctiveness levels.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches 2005Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking 1988First-mover advantages 1999Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures 2014Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies 2010Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs 2015Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding 2003Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups

Cited by

2024False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform 2024Signaling theory in entrepreneurial fundraising and crowdfunding research 2024Institutional quality and success in U.S. equity crowdfunding 2024Breaking down entrepreneurial barriers: exploring the nexus of entrepreneurial behavior, innovation, and bank credit access through the lens of the theory of planned behavior

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.