SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Minimal important change and difference in health outcome: An overview of approaches, concepts, and methods
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Minimal important change and difference in health outcome: An overview of approaches, concepts, and methods (2023)Minimal important change and difference i…Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures (2021)Minimal important change (MIC…How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods (2020)How is the minimal clinically…SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality…Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Writing narrative style liter…Minimal Clinically Important Difference (2014)Minimal Clinically Important …Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Defining consensus: A systema…The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)The COSMIN study reached inte…Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods (2009)Mind the MIC: large variation…Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes (2007)Recommended methods for deter…Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life (2003)Defining clinically meaningfu…Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures (2002)Methods to Explain the Clinic…Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Many faces of the minimal cli…A taxonomy for responsiveness (2001)A taxonomy for responsivenessInterpreting treatment effects in randomised trials (1998)Interpreting treatment effect…An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)An Assessment of Clinically U…Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments (1987)Measuring change over time: A…The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure (1981)Measurement of health status (1989)Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life (1993)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)the delphi method: techniques and applications (1975)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness (2021)Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences (1987)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)Sleep Health: Can We Define It? Does It Matter? (2014)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)QUANTIFYING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY USING THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AND THE SEM (2005)Reliability and Validity Assessment (2011)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement (2019)Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review (2020)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care: An Updated Analysis of the Literature (2021)What is the role of eco-labels for a circular economy? A rapid review of the literature (2021)Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review (2023)Minimal clinically important difference on the Beck Depression Inventory - II according to the patient's perspective (2015)Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study (2020)The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes4,487 cited
  • 2019SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles4,088 cited
  • 2014Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies3,786 cited
  • 2007Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes2,431 cited
  • 2015Writing narrative style literature reviews2,231 cited
  • 1987Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments1,882 cited
  • 1988An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment1,691 cited
  • 2002Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures1,525 cited
  • 2003Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life1,363 cited
  • 2014Minimal Clinically Important Difference705 cited
  • 2021Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures579 cited
  • 1998Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials516 cited
  • 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research514 cited
  • 2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A taxonomy for responsiveness
488 cited
  • 2020How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods453 cited
  • 2009Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods356 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.