SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The SCOPE framework – implementing the ideals of responsible research assessment
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
The SCOPE framework – implementing the ideals of responsible research assessment (2023)The SCOPE framework – implementing the id…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…The Tyranny of Metrics (2018)The Tyranny of MetricsThe Promise of Co‐Design for Public Policy (2018)The Promise of Co‐Design for …On misogynoir: citation, erasure, and plagiarism (2018)On misogynoir: citation, eras…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Evaluation practices and effe…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: Global gender …Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewBenefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects (2011)Benefits of Co-design in Serv…Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)University Research Evaluatio…The Metaevaluation Imperative (2001)The Metaevaluation ImperativeAssessing the impact of planned social change (1979)Assessing the impact of plann…Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences (2006)Science of science (2018)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)An Exploratory Investigation of User Involvement in New Service Development (2002)Co-creation and the new landscapes of design (2008)Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development (2010)Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? (2016)Co-Production and Co-Creation (2018)Customer journeys: a systematic literature review (2018)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs (2010)Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation (2010)Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment (2016)Assessing basic research (1983)Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (1988)The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? (2001)Tertiary education for the knowledge society (2008)University corporatisation: Driving redefinition (2010)Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union (2011)Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. (1992)Black looks: race and representation (1992)Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America (1998)The Impossibility of Being “Perfect and White”: Black Girls’ Racialized and Gendered Schooling Experiences (2019)Woke-washing: “intersectional” femvertising and branding “woke” bravery (2019)2.13 Cite Black Women: A Critical Praxis (A Statement) (2021) (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science1,496 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 1979Assessing the impact of planned social change864 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2003University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison635 cited
  • 2018On misogynoir: citation, erasure, and plagiarism597 cited
  • 2011Benefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects580 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2018The Tyranny of Metrics529 cited
  • 2015Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review466 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2018The Promise of Co‐Design for Public Policy

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

401 cited
  • 2001The Metaevaluation Imperative258 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.