Lexical density, lexical diversity, and lexical sophistication in simultaneously interpreted texts: a cognitive perspective

Juhua Dou

23 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Translation Studies and Practices Second Language Acquisition and Learning linguistics and terminology studies

Abstract

Simultaneous interpreting (SI) is a cognitively demanding task that imposes a heavy cognitive load on interpreters. Interpreting into one's native (A language) or non-native language (B language), known as interpreting directionality, involves different cognitive demands. The cognitive requirements of simultaneous interpreting as well as interpreting directionality affect the interpreting process and product. This current study focused on the lexical features of a specially designed corpus of United Nations Security Council speeches. The corpus included non-interpreted speeches in US English (SubCorpusE), and texts interpreted from Chinese into English (A-into-B interpreted texts, SubCorpusC-E) and from Russian into English (B-into-A interpreted texts, SubCorpusR-E). Ten measures were used to analyze the lexical features of each subcorpus in terms of lexical density, lexical diversity, and lexical sophistication. The three subcorpora were regrouped into two pairs for the two research questions: SubCorpusR-E versus SubCorpusE and SubCorpusR-E versus SubCorpusC-E. The results showed that the interpreted texts in SubCorpusR-E exhibited simpler vocabulary features than the non-interpreted texts in SubCorpusE. In addition, compared with the A-into-B interpreted texts, the B-into-A interpreted texts demonstrated simplified lexical characteristics. The lexical features of the interpreted texts reflect that experienced simultaneous interpreters consciously adopt a simplified vocabulary approach to manage the cognitive load during simultaneous interpreting. This study provides new insights into the cognitive aspects of simultaneous interpreting, the impact of directionality, and the role of lexical strategies. These findings have practical implications for interpreter training, professional growth, and maintaining interpreting quality in diverse settings.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

1958Perception and communication.2000A New Academic Word List 1999An Embedded-Processes Model of Working Memory 1993Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies — Implications and Applications 1952THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY 2016Introducing Interpreting Studies 1999Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies 2002Is Working Memory Still Working? 1Copyright © 2001 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted with permission from the original publication: . “Is Working Memory Still Working?” American Psychologist, 56, 849-864. This re-print publication is arranged in recognition of the conferral on Dr. Baddeley of the Aristotle Prize at the VIIth European Congress of Psychology, London, in July 2001, for his outstanding research on human working memory. The original publication in the American Psychologist related to Prof. Baddeley's receipt of the Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award of the American Psychological Association in 2001.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.