SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Engaging With Citations to References in the Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Era
10 references·1 citing·28 second hop
Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Engaging With Citations to References in the Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Era (2023)Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medic…Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threate…Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research (2023)Tempest in a teacup: An analy…Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good? (2023)Scientists used ChatGPT to ge…Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data (2023)Reducing the residue of retra…Executive Summary of the Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PALICC-2) (2023)Executive Summary of the Seco…Elevating scientific writing with ChatGPT: A guide for reviewers, editors… and authors (2023)Elevating scientific writing …Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…Writing for PCCM: Instructions for Authors (2022)Writing for PCCM: Instruction…Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)Could AI help you to write yo…Writing for PCCM: The 3,000-Word Structured Clinical Research Report (2021)Writing for PCCM: The 3,000-W…Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Editorials and Commentaries (2024)Writing for Pediatric Critica…The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers (1999)Too many digits: the presentation of numerical data (2015)New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the Journal (2019)Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: A Checklist When Using Administrative and Clinical Databases for Research (2024)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A power primer. (1992)A power primer. (1992)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent (2014)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)The American Psychological Association (1919)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences (2022)Will AI speed up literature reviews or derail them entirely? (2025)Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond (2023)Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? (2023)The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Facilitator or thinking inhibitor: understanding the role of ChatGPT-generated written corrective feedback in language learning (2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Research Integrity in Scholarly Publishing (2024)Writing without borders: AI and cross-cultural convergence in academic writing quality (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
  • 2023Executive Summary of the Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PALICC-2)341 cited
  • 2022Could AI help you to write your next paper?226 cited
  • 2023Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good?63 cited
  • 2023Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data28 cited
  • 2023Elevating scientific writing with ChatGPT: A guide for reviewers, editors… and authors26 cited
  • 2021Writing for PCCM: The 3,000-Word Structured Clinical Research Report23 cited
  • 2022Writing for PCCM: Instructions for Authors14 cited
  • 2023Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research14 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Writing for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Editorials and Commentaries10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work