SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Detecting generative artificial intelligence in scientific articles: Evasion techniques and implications for scientific integrity
7 references·6 citing·35 second hop
Detecting generative artificial intelligence in scientific articles: Evasion techniques and implications for scientific integrity (2023)Detecting generative artificial intellige…Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)Artificial Intelligence Can G…AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community (2023)AI-generated research paper f…AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation (2023)AI did not write this manuscr…Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT …Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020 (2021)Trends and Characteristics of…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses (2025)Do humans identify AI-generat…The promising and problematic potential of generative AI as a leveler of the publishing playing field (2024)The promising and problematic…Reviewing the performance of AI detection tools in differentiating between AI-generated and human-written texts: A literature and integrative hybrid review (2024)Reviewing the performance of …Digital Ink and Surgical Dreams: Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence–Generated Essays in Residency Applications (2024)Digital Ink and Surgical Drea…Characterizing the Increase in Artificial Intelligence Content Detection in Oncology Scientific Abstracts From 2021 to 2023 (2024)Characterizing the Increase i…Accuracy pecking order – How 30 AI detectors stack up in detecting generative artificial intelligence content in university English L1 and English L2 student essays (2024)Accuracy pecking order – How …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies (2015)A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature (2021)Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices (2023)Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education (2024)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics (2017)The Tech Cold War, the multipolarization of the world economy, and IB research (2023)The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks (2024)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor (2023)ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing (2023)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Combating misinformation in the age of LLMs: Opportunities and challenges (2024)Current safeguards, risk mitigation, and transparency measures of large language models against the generation of health disinformation: repeated cross sectional analysis (2024)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023 (2025)Comparative analysis of text-based plagiarism detection techniques (2025)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The Janus Effect of Generative AI: Charting the Path for Responsible Conduct of Scholarly Activities in Information Systems (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2023Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists610 cited
  • 2023Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened301 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2023AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community196 cited
  • 2023AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation168 cited
  • 2021Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 202068 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Reviewing the performance of AI detection tools in differentiating between AI-generated and human-written texts: A literature and integrative hybrid review56 cited
  • 2025Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses32 cited
  • 2024Characterizing the Increase in Artificial Intelligence Content Detection in Oncology Scientific Abstracts From 2021 to 202329 cited
  • 2024Digital Ink and Surgical Dreams: Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence–Generated Essays in Residency Applications18 cited
  • 2024Accuracy pecking order – How 30 AI detectors stack up in detecting generative artificial intelligence content in university English L1 and English L2 student essays

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 2024The promising and problematic potential of generative AI as a leveler of the publishing playing field15 cited