SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric tool to analyze data from google scholar metrics
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric tool to analyze data from google scholar metrics (2023)Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric tool to analyze…Latin American and Caribbean journals indexed in Google Scholar Metrics (2022)Latin American and Caribbean …Brazil Developing Current Research Information Systems (BrCRIS) as data sources for studies of research (2022)Brazil Developing Current Res…Periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados no Google Scholar Metrics (2020)Periódicos científicos brasil…Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment (2019)Google Scholar as a Data Sour…Toward the more effective identification of journals with anomalous self-citation (2018)Toward the more effective ide…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost bibliometric tool (2014)Google Scholar Metrics 2014: …The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? (2013)Ranking journals: could Googl…Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals (2012)Google Scholar Metrics: an un…Google Scholar Metrics for Publications (2012)Google Scholar Metrics for Pu…The influence of self-citation corrections and the fractionalised counting of multi-authored manuscripts on the Hirsch index (2009)The influence of self-citatio…Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines (2007)Sources of Google Scholar cit…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals (1999)Temporal differences in self-…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages (2013)The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search (2014)ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why? (2022)Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science (1990)Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1991)A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature (1995)A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science (2003)Journal self-citations—Analysing the JIF mechanism (2006)And, not or: Quality, quantity in scientific publishing (2017)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series (2015)Unveiling scientific communities about sustainability and innovation. A bibliometric journey around sustainable terms (2016)A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis (2011)Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late? (2012)Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research (2017)Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review (2021)Intelligent Cognitive Assistants for Attitude and Behavior Change Support in Mental Health: State-of-the-Art Technical Review (2021)Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options (2021)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature (2021)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)How to Rank Journals (2016)Increased Publication in Predatory Journals by Developing Countries' Institutions: What It Entails? And What Can Be Done? (2017)Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio (2020)Big Data: A Survey (2014)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited
  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited
  • 2007Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines172 cited
  • 2019Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment143 cited
  • 2013Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?107 cited
  • 1999Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals70 cited
  • 2012Google Scholar Metrics for Publications53 cited
  • 2012Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals45 cited
  • 2009The influence of self-citation corrections and the fractionalised counting of multi-authored manuscripts on the Hirsch index33 cited
  • 2022Latin American and Caribbean journals indexed in Google Scholar Metrics13 cited
  • 2022Brazil Developing Current Research Information Systems (BrCRIS) as data sources for studies of research13 cited
  • 2014Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost bibliometric tool

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 2018Toward the more effective identification of journals with anomalous self-citation8 cited
  • 2020Periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados no Google Scholar Metrics7 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.