SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Diagnosis Reliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Diagnosis Reliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation (2023)Diagnosis Reliability of ChatGPT for Jour…Readership Awareness Series – Paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT - Ethical Considerations in Scientific Publications (2023)Readership Awareness Series –…Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)Artificial intelligence in ac…Predatory Journals: Revisiting Beall’s Research (2022)Predatory Journals: Revisitin…Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles (2022)Authors publishing repeatedly…Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (2021)Prevalence of nonsensical alg…Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)Detecting a network of hijack…Integrity of Databases for Literature Searches in Nursing (2020)Integrity of Databases for Li…Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Negative Effects of “Predator…Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review (2017)Questionable papers in citati…Ranking Predatory Journals; Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It! (2016)Ranking Predatory Journals; S…Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics (2016)Hijacked journals, hijacked w…Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World (2016)Characteristics of Hijacked J…The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015 (2015)The full story of 90 hijacked…Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures (2015)Predatory journals and the br…How to hijack a journal (2015)How to hijack a journalEvaluating human resources management literacy: A performance analysis of ChatGPT and bard (2024)Evaluating human resources ma…Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)You are invited to submit… (2015)Predatory journals (2018)Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers (2021)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam” (2020)Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)Rethinking Scholarly Communication (2004)Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015 (2017)Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review (2014)Reef Resources Assessment and Management Technical Paper (2014)The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. (2015)Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing (2016)Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach (1968)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Ten (Bad) reasons researchers publish their papers in hijacked journals (2021)Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries (2023)The ‘hijacking’ of the Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems: Implications for the information systems community (2023)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Is ChatGPT a valid author? (2023)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)The Human Right to Health (2011)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Toward a New Common Sense (2021)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT (2023)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI (2024)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer (2023)An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage (2024)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance136 cited
  • 2018Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research129 cited
  • 2021Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature83 cited
  • 2016Ranking Predatory Journals; Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!80 cited
  • 2016Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics77 cited
  • 2015Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures73 cited
  • 2023Readership Awareness Series – Paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT - Ethical Considerations in Scientific Publications58 cited
  • 2015The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 201551 cited
  • 2021Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive44 cited
  • 2016Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World43 cited
  • 2015How to hijack a journal36 cited
  • 2020Integrity of Databases for Literature Searches in Nursing36 cited
  • 2017Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

33 cited
  • 2022Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles31 cited
  • 2022Predatory Journals: Revisiting Beall’s Research27 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Evaluating human resources management literacy: A performance analysis of ChatGPT and bard21 cited