SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authorship equity in global health research: who gets the credit at University of California, San Francisco?
9 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Authorship equity in global health research: who gets the credit at University of California, San Francisco? (2023)Authorship equity in global health resear…Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us? (2022)Decolonizing global health: w…Epistemic injustice in academic global health (2021)Epistemic injustice in academ…A call for reforms in global health publications (2021)A call for reforms in global …Will global health survive its decolonisation? (2020)Will global health survive it…The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis (2020)The role of geographic bias i…Authorship in studies conducted in low-and-middle income countries and published by Reproductive Health: advancing equitable global health research collaborations (2020)Authorship in studies conduct…Who is telling the story? A systematic review of authorship for infectious disease research conducted in Africa, 1980–2016 (2019)Who is telling the story? A s…The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)The foreign gaze: authorship …Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016 (2019)Stuck in the middle: a system…The Importance of Social Intervention in Britain's Mortality Decline c.1850–1914: a Re-interpretation of the Role of Public Health (1988)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: reimagining global mental health (2021)Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology (2021)8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2024)Scrambling for Africa: AIDS, expertise, and the rise of American global health science (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Africa as a Living Laboratory (2011)Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight (2020)How global is global health research? A large-scale analysis of trends in authorship (2021)Strengthening research capacity: a systematic review of manuscript writing and publishing interventions for researchers in low-income and middle-income countries (2022)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Beyond PICO (2012)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)Promoting inclusivity in health professions education publishing (2022)How to address the geographical bias in academic publishing (2023)Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Authorship trends in The Lancet Global Health: only the tip of the iceberg? (2018)Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria Among Faculty Members of Pharmacy and Other Health Sciences in Jordan (2018)Bibliometric analysis of authorship patterns in publications from a research group at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 2016–2020 (2023)Decolonising Global (Public) Health: from Western universalism to Global pluriversalities (2020)Decolonising global health: if not now, when? (2020)Decolonising global health in 2021: a roadmap to move from rhetoric to reform (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Can the Subaltern Speak? (2003)Epistemic injustice in psychiatric research and practice (2022)How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide (2022)Unfair knowledge practices in global health: a realist synthesis (2024)Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader (1995)Towards a common definition of global health (2009)Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development (2012)Global health and the elite capture of decolonization: On reformism and the possibilities of alternate paths (2023)Global inequities in access to COVID-19 health products and technologies: A political economy analysis (2023)Association of International Editorial Staff With Published Articles From Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2022)Challenges facing Arab researchers in conducting and publishing scientific research: a qualitative interview study (2023)Impact of COVID-19 on routine childhood immunisations in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021Epistemic injustice in academic global health449 cited
  • 2019The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health445 cited
  • 2020Will global health survive its decolonisation?395 cited
  • 2019Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016292 cited
  • 2022Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?171 cited
  • 2019Who is telling the story? A systematic review of authorship for infectious disease research conducted in Africa, 1980–2016154 cited
  • 2020The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis142 cited
  • 2021A call for reforms in global health publications35 cited
  • 2020Authorship in studies conducted in low-and-middle income countries and published by Reproductive Health: advancing equitable global health research collaborations20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work