SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
16 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review (2023)Peer reviewers' willingness to review, th…Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review (2022)Nobel and Novice: Author Prom…A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)Peer Review Bias: A Critical …The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The changing forms and expect…Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Impact of interventions to im…A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)A Guideline of Selecting and …Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias (2015)Medical Journal Peer Review: …Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications (2012)Interrater agreement and inte…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The effects of blinding on th…The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review (1990)The Effects of Blinding on th…A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections (2024)A harm reduction approach to …Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review (2020)Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare (2021)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors (1994)The Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS): A dynamic, multimodal set of facial and vocal expressions in North American English (2018)Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features (2019)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Scientific peer review (2011)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Publication and related biases. (2000)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research29,261 cited
  • 2012Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications921 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review261 cited
  • 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited
  • 2018The changing forms and expectations of peer review179 cited
  • 2019Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review165 cited
  • 2022Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review146 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias125 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.113 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections8 cited