SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review: Characteristics and outcomes of in-school digital media literacy interventions, 2010-2021
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Systematic review: Characteristics and outcomes of in-school digital media literacy interventions, 2010-2021 (2023)Systematic review: Characteristics and ou…The Use of Social Media in Children and Adolescents: Scoping Review on the Potential Risks (2022)The Use of Social Media in Ch…School-Based Interventions Improve Body Image and Media Literacy in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)School-Based Interventions Im…Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Digital Literacy Game for Tweens (2021)Design, Development, and Eval…The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study (2020)The effective components of c…Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: A meta‐analysis (2020)Social media use and risky be…A meta-analysis of media literacy interventions for deviant behaviors (2019)A meta-analysis of media lite…Are media literacy interventions effective at changing attitudes and intentions towards risky health behaviors in adolescents? A meta‐analytic review (2018)Are media literacy interventi…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Review of Literature on Media Literacy (2013)Review of Literature on Media…Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review (2012)Media Literacy Interventions:…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Meta-Synthesis of Health Behavior Change Meta-Analyses (2010)Meta-Synthesis of Health Beha…The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (2009)The SAGE handbook of organiza…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Producing a systematic review. (2009)Producing a systematic review.The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Public Health Communication (2002)What type of content are smartphone users addicted to?: SNS vs. games (2015)Media Literacy: From a Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy (2018)Associations Between Time Spent Using Social Media and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems Among US Youth (2019)Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Problematic Social Media Use and Health among Adolescents (2021)Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Mechanisms linking social media use to adolescent mental health vulnerability (2024)Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction* (1981)Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings (2002)Digital game-based learning (2003)A review of using digital game-based learning for preschoolers (2022)The influence of digital educational games on preschool Children's creative thinking (2022)Human–Computer Interaction and Digital Literacy Promote Educational Learning in Pre-school Children: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience for Kids’ Mental Well-Being and School Readiness (2023)A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Annual Research Review: Sex, gender, and internalizing conditions among adolescents in the 21st century – trends, causes, consequences (2023)The Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review (2023)Problematic social media use in childhood and adolescence (2024)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow (2013)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2009The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods2,127 cited
  • 2009Producing a systematic review.2,063 cited
  • 2022The Use of Social Media in Children and Adolescents: Scoping Review on the Potential Risks552 cited
  • 2012Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review487 cited
  • 2020Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: A meta‐analysis410 cited
  • 2020The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study190 cited
  • 2010Meta-Synthesis of Health Behavior Change Meta-Analyses158 cited
  • 2013Review of Literature on Media Literacy130 cited
  • 2018Are media literacy interventions effective at changing attitudes and intentions towards risky health behaviors in adolescents? A meta‐analytic review115 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
School-Based Interventions Improve Body Image and Media Literacy in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
109 cited
  • 2019A meta-analysis of media literacy interventions for deviant behaviors66 cited
  • 2021Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Digital Literacy Game for Tweens64 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.