SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions (2023)Eleven strategies for making reproducible…Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Bridging Neurodiversity and O…A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms (2022)A community-sourced glossary …UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (2021)UNESCO Recommendation on Open…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Replicability, Robustness, an…Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Challenges for assessing repl…Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Scoping review on interventio…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)Implications of the Credibili…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. (2016)The religiosity as social val…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Publications (2013)Reporting Quality of Social a…Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning (1992)Electronic documents give rep…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Fixing the Growth Illusion: New Directions for Research in Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth (2019)Post‐traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations (2020)The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics (2020)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)A power primer. (1992)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Analysis: Challenges and Solutions (2022)An invitation to reproducible computational research (2010)Journal of Computational Neuroscience (2013)Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility (2016)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions (2024)Evaluating the linguistic coverage of OpenAlex : An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2021Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science769 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2021UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science446 cited
  • 2018Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress361 cited
  • 2021Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology308 cited
  • 1992Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning212 cited
  • 2022A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms161 cited
  • 2019Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research153 cited
  • 2013Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Publications111 cited
  • 2016The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

111 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • 2022Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education90 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.